Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switching from using diff cover executable to diff cover import #237

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Switching from using diff cover executable to diff cover import #237

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kelper-hub
Copy link

@kelper-hub kelper-hub commented Dec 3, 2024 •
edited by qodo-merge-pro bot
Loading

PR Type

enhancement, tests

Description

  • Refactored the generate_diff_coverage_report method in UnitTestValidator.py to use the diff_cover_main function instead of executing a shell command directly.
  • Improved error handling and logging for the diff coverage report generation process.
  • Enhanced the documentation for the generate_diff_coverage_report method to provide better clarity on its functionality.
  • Updated existing tests and added new tests in test_UnitTestValidator.py to verify both successful and failure scenarios of the diff coverage report generation.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
UnitTestValidator.py
Refactor diff coverage report generation using `diff_cover_main`

cover_agent/UnitTestValidator.py

  • Replaced direct command execution with diff_cover_main function call.
  • Added error handling for diff_cover_main execution.
  • Updated logging to reflect changes in diff coverage report generation.
  • Enhanced documentation for generate_diff_coverage_report method.
    		•  +28/-14 
    Tests
    test_UnitTestValidator.py
    Enhance tests for diff coverage report generation               

    tests/test_UnitTestValidator.py

  • Updated test to check for success of generate_diff_coverage_report.
  • Added new test to handle failure scenario of
    generate_diff_coverage_report.
  • Modified assertions to improve test reliability.
    		•  +29/-5   

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    @kelper-hub kelper-hub changed the title User/kepler hub/using diff coverage import Switching from using diff cover executable to diff cover import Dec 3, 2024
    @qodo-merge-pro Qodo Merge Pro
    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling
    The error handling for diff_cover_main silently catches all exceptions and only logs them. Consider whether some errors should be re-raised to prevent the process from continuing with invalid state.

    Code Smell
    The diff_cover_args list contains hardcoded command name 'diff-cover' which may be redundant since we're calling the function directly rather than executing a shell command.

    @qodo-merge-pro Qodo Merge Pro
    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Dec 3, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Enhance error handling to prevent silent failures in critical operations

    The error handling in generate_diff_coverage_report silently continues after
    catching exceptions. This could lead to undefined behavior since the diff coverage
    report might be missing or incomplete. Add a re-raise or return a failure status.

    cover_agent/UnitTestValidator.py [771-774]

     try:
     diff_cover_main(diff_cover_args)
 except Exception as e:
     self.logger.error(f"Error running diff-cover: {e}")
+    raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to generate diff coverage report: {e}")
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: The suggestion addresses a critical issue where silent failures could mask important errors and lead to undefined behavior. The improved error handling ensures failures are properly propagated and visible.

    		9

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    @kelper-hub
    Copy link
    Author

    kelper-hub commented Dec 3, 2024 •
    edited
    Loading

    Local run:

    
> % cover-agent \
>   --source-file-path "templated_tests/python_fastapi/app.py" \
>   --test-file-path "templated_tests/python_fastapi/test_app.py" \
>   --project-root "templated_tests/python_fastapi" \
>   --code-coverage-report-path "templated_tests/python_fastapi/coverage.xml" \
>   --test-command "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml --cov-report=term" \
>   --test-command-dir "templated_tests/python_fastapi" \
>   --coverage-type "cobertura" \
>   --desired-coverage 70 \
>   --max-iterations 10 \
>   --diff-coverage
> 2024-12-02 18:38:44,707 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Diff coverage enabled. Using coverage report: templated_tests/python_fastapi/diff-cover-report.json
> Streaming results from LLM model...
> ```yaml
> language: python
> testing_framework: pytest
> number_of_tests: 1
> test_headers_indentation: 0
> ```
> 
> Streaming results from LLM model...
> ```yaml
> language: python
> testing_framework: pytest
> number_of_tests: 1
> relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after: 16
> relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after: 5
> ```
> 
> 2024-12-02 18:38:46,467 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Running build/test command to generate coverage report: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml --cov-report=term"
> 2024-12-02 18:38:47,548 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Running diff coverage module with args: "['diff-cover', '--json-report', 'templated_tests/python_fastapi/diff-cover-report.json', '--compare-branch=main', 'templated_tests/python_fastapi/coverage.xml']"
> 2024-12-02 18:38:47,596 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Initial coverage: 66.67%
> 2024-12-02 18:38:47,598 - cover_agent.CoverAgent - INFO - Current Diff Coverage: 66.67%
> 2024-12-02 18:38:47,598 - cover_agent.CoverAgent - INFO - Desired Coverage: 70%
> -------------
> Diff Coverage
> Diff: main...HEAD, staged and unstaged changes
> -------------
> templated_tests/python_fastapi/app.py (66.7%): Missing lines 133
> -------------
> Total:   3 lines
> Missing: 1 line
> Coverage: 66%
> -------------
> 
> Streaming results from LLM model...
> ```yaml
> language: python
> existing_test_function_signature: |
>   def test_root():
> new_tests:
> - test_behavior: |
>     Test the /time endpoint to ensure it returns the current time in ISO format.
>   lines_to_cover: |
>     [133]
>   test_name: |
>     test_time_endpoint
>   test_code: |
>     def test_time_endpoint():
>         response = client.get("/time")
>         assert response.status_code == 200
>         assert "time" in response.json()
>   new_imports_code: |
>     ""
>   test_tags: happy path
> ```
> 
> 2024-12-02 18:38:50,607 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Running test with the following command: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml --cov-report=term"
> 2024-12-02 18:38:51,686 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Running diff coverage module with args: "['diff-cover', '--json-report', 'templated_tests/python_fastapi/diff-cover-report.json', '--compare-branch=main', 'templated_tests/python_fastapi/coverage.xml']"
> 2024-12-02 18:38:51,740 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Test passed and coverage increased. Current coverage: 100.0%
> 2024-12-02 18:38:51,775 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Running build/test command to generate coverage report: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml --cov-report=term"
> 2024-12-02 18:38:52,843 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Running diff coverage module with args: "['diff-cover', '--json-report', 'templated_tests/python_fastapi/diff-cover-report.json', '--compare-branch=main', 'templated_tests/python_fastapi/coverage.xml']"
> 2024-12-02 18:38:52,887 - cover_agent.UnitTestValidator - INFO - Initial coverage: 100.0%
> 2024-12-02 18:38:52,887 - cover_agent.CoverAgent - INFO - Reached above target coverage of 70% (Current Coverage: 100.0%) in 1 iterations.
> 2024-12-02 18:38:52,887 - cover_agent.CoverAgent - INFO - Total number of input tokens used for LLM model gpt-4o: 3043
> 2024-12-02 18:38:52,887 - cover_agent.CoverAgent - INFO - Total number of output tokens used for LLM model gpt-4o: 190
> -------------
> Diff Coverage
> Diff: main...HEAD, staged and unstaged changes
> -------------
> templated_tests/python_fastapi/app.py (100%)
> templated_tests/python_fastapi/test_app.py (100%)
> -------------
> Total:   7 lines
> Missing: 0 lines
> Coverage: 100%
> -------------
> 
> -------------
> Diff Coverage
> Diff: main...HEAD, staged and unstaged changes
> -------------
> templated_tests/python_fastapi/app.py (100%)
> templated_tests/python_fastapi/test_app.py (100%)
> -------------
> Total:   7 lines
> Missing: 0 lines
> Coverage: 100%
> -------------
>

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers
    No reviews
    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    Review effort [1-5]: 2
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    1 participant
    @kelper-hub